CURRENT News

6THCIRCUIT Judge Eviscerates Denison’s Lawyer over Pre-Determined Guilt of Accused Male

, , , , /

6THCIRCUIT Judge Eviscerates Denison’s Lawyer over Pre-Determined Guilt of Accused Male

The 6th Circuit was hearing a case against Ohio’s private Denison University, which expelled a male student after his female sex partner accused him of nonconsensual sex stemming from another male student spiking her alcoholic drink. Circuit Judge Thapar rebuffed Denison lawyer Natalie McLaughlin for implying that Denison can get off the hook for discrimination against males by claiming that it might get sued by female accusers as well. “Counsel, universities have a tough road to hoe but what they can’t do is discriminate, whether it’s against whites, blacks, women, men.”

thecollegefix.com By Greg Piper

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter

, , /

ACTIVIST Mommy: Something is Seriously Wrong w the #Metoo Movement.

“Something is seriously wrong with the #metoo sexual harassment movement…What the #metoo movement is, is a power grab. This is a radical feminist assault on men and masculinity.  This is an assault on the natural love between men and women…It’s getting to the point where we’re almost rolling our eyes when we hear about the next sexual harassment victim. Way to go feminists, you have forever reduced the term sexual assault to mean absolutely nothing.”

 

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
EXPELLED Male Sues Oberlin: Claims Every Accused College Student Is Found Guilty.

, , , /

EXPELLED Male Sues Oberlin: Claims Every Accused College Student Is Found Guilty.

A male student, John Doe, was expelled from Oberlin campus in October 2016 for alleged sexual assault. Doe has filed a federal lawsuit against Oberlin, and contains allegations which, if proven, reflect that Oberlin’s system for adjudicating sexual assault accusations was fundamentally biased against males, at least during the 2015-2016 academic year. The details of the sexual encounter and recriminations are all too familiar to anyone who has read the complaints being filed around the country regarding higher education sexual assault adjudications. The encounter started as consensual by everyone’s account…

legalinsurrection.com By William A. Jacobson John-Doe-v-Oberlin-Complaint

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
DUE PROCESS Matters. He Was Always Innocent, She Accused Falsely, and the Jury Agreed.

, , , , /

DUE PROCESS Matters. He Was Always Innocent, She Accused Falsely, and the Jury Agreed.

Nearly four years ago, Mr. Robinson was [falsely] accused of sex assault at the College of Charleston after a night of drinking. He was arrested, labeled a rapist and thrown out of the school…But it took a jury about 28 minutes to acquit Robinson recently, and cleared him of any criminal wrongdoing. In his lawyers’ eyes, his case illustrates how an intense nationwide focus on sexual assault and harassment, particularly involving college students and celebrities, is breeding ignorance of due process standards. “It felt like a cloud over my head was lifted,” Robinson said of his experience. “Finally, somebody listened to me and believed me.- My emotions unleashed, and I just cried,” he said.

postandcourier.com By Andrew Knapp

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
DISHONEST Jackie Coakley’s Fake Rape Is Costing Rolling Stone Millions

, , , /

DISHONEST Jackie Coakley’s Fake Rape Is Costing Rolling Stone Millions

In New York federal court, Rolling Stone wrapped up the last remaining piece of litigation emanating from its retracted 2014 article about a rape [of proven liar Jackie Coakley] at a University of Virginia campus fraternity. The settlement is the third for Rolling Stone over the Sabrina Rubin Erdely article, titled “A Rape on Campus,” which prompted a commissioned investigation by the Columbia School of Journalism over its faults. The first settlement came after R.S. lost a trial with Nicole Eramo.(Eramo received a $3 million verdict at trial.) Rolling Stone’s second settlement came to a $1.65 million deal with the fraternity itself.  And now comes the third settlement. Per the agreement, “some of the fraternity members become beneficiaries of a settlement whose terms were not provided in court.” The stipulations of the settlement included a confidentiality clause.

hollywoodreporter.com By E. Gardner 12 articles on Jackie/R.Stone in Court

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
STUDY Confirms: College Females Are Much Safer than Non-College Females

, , /

STUDY Confirms: College Females Are Much Safer than Non-College Females

A new study by University of Michigan sociologist William Axinn, which gathered responses from a larger “family growth” survey that targeted women 15 to 44, confirms earlier studies that found less educated women are at far higher risk than their educated counterparts…”Axinn’s study exposes the Obama administration’s Title IX regime for the elitist and politically-motivated overcorrection it was…the previous administration opted to overprotect [college] women exactly when the president most needed an aging white liberal coalition of college-educated women and panicked parents on his side.”

thecollegefix.com By G. Piper Campus Rape Myth By H. MacDonald

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
NO CHARGES for Rodney Anderson. Accuser Courtney Thornton Lied for Political Gain

, , , /

NO CHARGES for Rodney Anderson. Accuser Courtney Thornton Lied for Political Gain

The district attorney’s office for Cleveland County, Oklahoma, determined that criminal charges were not warranted against University of Oklahoma running back Rodney Anderson after a police investigation into whether he sexually assaulted a woman who filed an emergency protective order against him. The accuser was hoping to have a romantic relationship with Anderson…”she then began to brag about the relationship that she was having with him,” said Assistant DA Susan Caswell.  Anderson’s attorney Derek Chance said in a statement. “The investigation reveals what we have maintained, Mr. Anderson is innocent of these allegations.”

abcnews.go.com  Accuser sought political gain

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
COMPASSION For Brock Turner

, , , , /

COMPASSION For Brock Turner

I have compassion for Brock Turner. Why? Because 1) I have a caring heart and 2) I took the time to read the Brock Turner Truth website. This website presents factual information about Mr. Turner’s Stanford court case, and the players/officials involved. Volunteers and concerned citizens created the website because they are appalled at the unrelenting viscous mis-information campaign directed at Mr.Turner and his court case. Many journalists/bloggers haven’t taken the time to look at the facts of Turner’s case, and the media have been remiss in editing out important details and facts surrounding the events of Mr. Turner’s case. If journalists take time to read http://www.brockturnertruth.com/putting-it-in-perspective- it will clarify why Mr. Turner is appealing his case.

“I don’t want him to feel like his life is over and I don’t want him to rot in jail.  He does not need to be behind bars.”   Statement by Jane Doe

I have compassion in my heart for Brock Turner because I care. He should not have to endure bloodthristy cancerous hate 24/7, nor should his family be subjected to a continuous stream of vicious mob attacks. The merciless attacks on Mr. Turner’s family should cease, and if people actually read the enormous amount of factual information about his case, they would have compassion for Brock Turner too, and understand why he is appealing.

-Alice True

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
#METOO: From Salem to Now

, /

#METOO: From Salem to Now

Salem Village, 1692.  Young girls caught up in the frenzied hysteria of witchcraft led to accusations of more than 200 people. These young girls voiced their accusations for attention and personal gain,  Testimony alone is, and should be, insufficient for acceptance as fact.  And now, in 2017, imagine the precedent that we accept by allowing that nothing more than personal allegations of sexual assault, is all that is required to discern the facts from allegations. Facts and an allegation are not the same thing. Facts require evidence deemed sufficient to be considered indisputable. An allegation is a claim made in the absence of such evidence, and while an allegation certainly might qualify as testimony, that testimony doesn’t necessarily qualify as evidence of facts. Today we find ourselves in a world where allegations can ruin a man absent any of the evidence which would be required to reasonably prove any wrongdoing of any kind…Accused men or women should still be presumed innocent unless it is proven otherwise. If we lose our grasp on this principle we cede centuries’ worth of costly-to-win ideological ground.

americanthinker.com By William Sullivan

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
UCSF FIRED Title IX Cristina Perez-Abelson for Falsifying Records, Hiding Files

, , , /

UCSF FIRED Title IX Cristina Perez-Abelson for Falsifying Records, Hiding Files

UCSF fired the head of its sexual harassment prevention office last spring after determining that she ordered an employee to falsify dates on complaints to make it appear that they were handled more efficiently.  In June 2016, someone called UC’s whistle-blower hotline and said Perez-Abelson had “repeatedly instructed staff to cover up and put inaccurate dates” on the cases they were investigating. Perez-Abelson denied the findings and called the investigation process inadequate. [..That’s calling the kettle black]

sfchronicle.com By Nanette Asimov

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
«< 88 89 90 91 92 >»