Search Results for: Cornell

MALES BEWARE: Hundreds of Sex Complaints Reported at Cornell, NYU. OR as I Call it: Recruitment of Female Accusers is Rising

, , , /

MALES BEWARE: Hundreds of Sex Complaints Reported at Cornell, NYU. OR as I Call it: Recruitment of Female Accusers is Rising

One hundred sexual misconduct complaints were made at New York University in just the first five months of this year, according to a new state report. The complaints put the Manhattan college second in the state behind Cornell University, which had 199 incidents reported from January through May 2018. Columbia University logged 43 complaints. Cornell contends that the high number of complaints was related to better education and prevention programs that increased awareness among students of resources and support services. [SOS contends the high number is due to an expansive and weakened definition of consent sex (hug, fist bump, selfie)  and aggressive recruitment tactics influencing females to believe they’ve been sexually assaulted-when it is their feelings that have been violated only]

nypost By Klein and Balsamini

 

CORNELL SETTLES w Acc’d Male. Seriously, Cornell is Unsafe for Males. #StayAway

, , , , /

CORNELL SETTLES w Acc’d Male. Seriously, Cornell is Unsafe for Males. #StayAway

It is great news that Cornell settled with this innocent accused male student. But every high school male should seriously consider, not to attend Cornell. Cornell is without a doubt, a deceitful ugly and unsafe educational environment for young males. If you think I am over reacting, you can review SOS’s posts regarding Cornell and read the many court decisions against Cornell for not following their TIX policies, and for railroading their tuition paying males. I can not stress enough, if you are a male stay away from that godforsaken Cornell campus.

LAWSUIT: Due to Lauren Aycock’s False TIX Claims, Cornell Denies Male his Ph.D.

, , , , /

LAWSUIT: Due to Lauren Aycock’s False TIX Claims, Cornell Denies Male his Ph.D.

Cornell is withholding a Ph.D. from Yogesh Patil for the crime of allegedly defending his professor. Patil was days away from receiving his Ph.D. in physics. His family was traveling from his native India to beautiful Ithaca, New York, to be there for the ceremony. This was a huge achievement and a glorious day for Mr. Patil and his family. Except there was a more important value at stake for Cornell University than Patil’s degree. A TIX complaint filed by physics student Lauren Aycock. Lauren had previously accused Patil’s advisor and physics Prof. Vengalattore of sexual assault. (One of Lauren’s allegations against Vengalattore included that he left her “middle initial” off her name in an author list, which constituted “sexual harassment”) Lauren is not accusing Patil of sexual misconduct, but she is alleging that Patil retaliated against her for making a “good faith” sexual misconduct report against Vengalattore. Lauren’s TIX complaint against Patil caused Cornell to determine “three days before he was slated to graduate,” to withhold his PhD. Today, Yogesh Patil is at risk of getting sent back to India as the Title IX office investigates a Title IX retaliation claim against him…  Apparently Cornell is not dissuaded by a third of its law school faculty going to court to force Cornell to follow its own Title IX  rules.  “I don’t think they have the right to abuse a Ph.D. student like this and I think they are allowing an abuse of the TitleIX system.” Former Cornell physics professor Mr. Schwab.

thecollegefix.com Piper Yogesh Patil & the Offense of Defense Greenfield

CORNELL LAW Professors Join Strengthening Push For Due Process On Campus

, , , /

CORNELL LAW Professors Join Strengthening Push For Due Process On Campus

Cornell University is so bad at conducting sex assault and harassment investigations that 23 professors from its law school have filed a brief in court to require the school to follow its own policies. John Doe’s complaint and the professors’ brief allege that the failure to follow written policy in Doe’s case violates Article 78 of New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, which, among other things, allows students at private schools to challenge disciplinary findings that are “made in violation of lawful procedure” and are “arbitrary and capricious.” The professors also explain, through pages of case law, quotes from treatises, and plain common sense, why cross-examination has deservedly been called “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” Especially in cases that hinge on the parties’ credibility and the accuracy of their testimony, such as this one, cross-examination is essential for allowing fact-finders to reach accurate conclusions about what actually happened. These 23 law professors join a lengthy list of legal scholars who have also criticized their schools and Title IX policies for unfair bias against accused students.

thefire.org By Susan Kruth thefederalist.com By Ashe Schow

23 CORNELL LAW Profs File Amicus Brief Supporting Falsely Accused Male Student

, , , , /

23 CORNELL LAW Profs File Amicus Brief Supporting Falsely Accused Male Student

We’ve covered Cornell’s Title IX woes a ridiculous number of times, but the Ivy League school’s capacity to publicly embarrass itself is practically limitless. A third of its law school faculty has gone to court to force the school to follow its own Title IX rules. The March 25 brief was filed by Prof. Sheri Lynn Johnson, and it has a single purpose: to call out Cornell for depriving an accused student his Cornell-granted right “to test his accuser’s account of events and credibility by having a disciplinary hearing panel ask his accuser proper questions that he proposes. … This right was not honored here.” The professors  are concerned that if Cornell is allowed to ignore its own procedures in this case, it will continue to do so in future Title IX cases, as will other colleges who see there are no consequences to flouting their explicit promises to students.

legalinsurrection.com William A. Jacobson  thecollegefix.com Greg Piper

 

MUSLIM Male Sues Cornell. Title IX’s Biased & Harmful Investigation Left Him Suicidal

, , /

MUSLIM Male Sues Cornell. Title IX’s Biased & Harmful Investigation Left Him Suicidal

A male graduate is suing Cornell University in federal court, claiming that Cornell and its Title IX investigator Sarah Affel, conducted a biased, arbitrary, capricious, unfair and harmful investigation.  John Doe’s complaint accuses Affel of discriminating against him based on his sex, religion and ethnicity and failing to consider the results of a polygraph test he voluntarily took and passed. Doe further accuses Affel of relying on anti-male, and anti-South Asian stereotypes to find him responsible; and employed anti-Muslim bias when one of the witnesses brought up Doe’s Muslim faith, at which point Affel began to question the witness about Doe’s level of respect for women…The investigation and the one-year suspension handed to Doe gave him severe mental health problems-problems that resulted in his contemplating suicide and his being admitted to a psychiatric ward “for several days.”  Doe is demanding a jury trial and is asking the University for damages.

cornellsun.com By Drew Musto

CHARGES Dismissed. Cornell Male Was Always Innocent.

, , , /

CHARGES Dismissed. Cornell Male Was Always Innocent.

The sexual assault charges brought against former Cornell basketball forward Xavier Eaglin ’19 in March 2016 have been dismissed. Although Eaglin no longer faces criminal charges, he will not be able to return to Cornell. After his arrest, Eaglin was dismissed from the basketball team and banned from campus. He spent seven days in jail before he was bailed out by his parents and then returned home. “We are just thankful justice prevailed and that we can start repairing our lives,” said Eaglin’s mother Clara Eaglin.

cornellsun.com By Anna Delwiche

CORNELL’s Title IX is ‘Perverse & Bizarre’- Judge Stops Suspension

, , , /

CORNELL’s Title IX is ‘Perverse & Bizarre’- Judge Stops Suspension

A male found guilty by Cornell of sexually assaulting a female could be back on campus because a judge temporarily barred the University from suspending him. Unbelievably, Cornell also slapped a second guilty finding against John Doe. Cornell ruled that the male student accused the female student of sexual assault as “a tactical maneuver and in bad faith.” The panel said the male student, in claiming that Roe had initiated sex without his affirmative consent, had put Roe “through the proverbial wringer” and that it constituted retaliation, prohibited by Cornell policy…John Doe’s lawsuit alleges both that Cornell arbitrarily and prejudicially departed from its own policies and that Cornell’s findings of guilt are unsupported by the available evidence.

cornellsun.com By Drew Musto

WIN: Judge says NO to Cornell. You Can’t Do What You Want

, , , /

WIN: Judge says NO to Cornell. You Can’t Do What You Want

Professors dispute negative tenure decisions all the time, but rarely do their cases end up in court. That’s because pursuing a legal case against an institution is time-consuming and costly and, most importantly, courts nearly always defer to colleges’ and universities’ initial judgments.
Not so though with an ongoing case at Cornell University. A state judge in November ruled that the university had so bungled a tenure review that he vacated the original decision against the professor in question and ordered a new one. Judge Rich blasted Cornell for ignoring its own rules and acting “capriciously… “The professor was entitled to due process. Cornell speaks of a level playing field but keeping the allegations secret from Vengalattore while having those allegations sour his tenure review creates anything but a level playing field and was arbitrary and capricious,”

thecollegefix.com By Piper  Rare Victory Tenure Dispute Case

 

1 2 3 4