SEVEN BIG Lies In The Brock Turner Case, Plagiarism at Stanford

A review of Stanford police reports, as attached to the criminal complaint filed with Santa Clara County Superior Court, and other public records reveals a number of major lies, including significant discrepancies and wrongdoing that Stanford itself has failed to address.

Seven Big Lies in the Brock Turner Case:

1. Turner committed rape. Totally false.

2. The hookup between Turner and Ms. Miller was in secret, behind a dumpster. Again, totally false.

3. Ms. Miller wrote the sensationalized statement she read at Turner’s sentencing. Also false.

4. Ms. Miller’s mother drove them to the KA party. There are serious questions whether this is true.

5. Stanford’s police did not record the license plates in the KA parking lot. Again, totally false yet this is what Turner’s lawyer was told three weeks later.

6. Turner ran from the scene and that proves his guilt. False.

7. Turner took and circulated a photo of Ms. Miller. Again, totally false but carefully used in the media campaign against Turner that was already being orchestrated by Prof. Michele Dauber, a member of Stanford’s law school faculty.

Seven Big Lies in the Brock Turner Case

Plagiarism at Stanford:

Stanford defines plagiarism as follows: “For purposes of the Stanford University Honor Code, plagiarism is defined as the use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or acknowledging the author or source, of another person’s original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language, research, strategies, writing or other form(s). Moreover, verbatim text from another source must always be put in (or within) quotation marks.”

How can Stanford post at the memorial (contemplative garden) words Ms. Miller falsely said she wrote if a student would be punished for plagiarism for making the same false claims and engaging in the same false activities? Faculty likewise are subject to severe punishment and academic scorn if involved in plagiarism in any way. That being the case, does no one at Stanford think it is a serious problem that Stanford is celebrating this blatant and ongoing lie about authorship? And is no one at Stanford going to address these serious violations of academic integrity by a member of their law school’s faculty? Plagarism at Stanford 

Stanford Alumni should care. Stanford Alumni are standing silent and allowing a complex injustice of malfeasance to continue. Stanford Alumni should be ashamed with their own silence. Alice