LAWSUIT: John Sues Jane and UChicago. It’s Because of This Admitted Liar-Jane-That Parents Fight For Due Process
John Expelled: On June 5, 2018, four days before he was scheduled to graduate with honors, UChicago expelled John Doe. The purported bases for UC’s decision to expel John were the false and defamatory allegations of his ex-girlfriend, Jane Roe. UC expelled John despite overwhelming evidence that Jane fabricated her story because she was too embarrassed to admit to her friends at UC that she was engaged in a secret sexual relationship with her ex-boyfriend.
John & Jane Meet: In the Autumn Quarter 2017, Plaintiff was in his senior year at UC. Plaintiff was an exemplary student, on track to earn his B.A. degree in June 2018. As a result of his academic excellence and successful summer work history, Plaintiff obtained an offer of employment with a global supply chain consulting firm, contingent upon his successful completion of his studies at UC. Plaintiff first met defendant Jane Roe at a mixer in October of 2017. The next week, they saw each other again at a fraternity “bar night.” That night, Plaintiff and Jane Roe went back to Plaintiff’s apartment and spent the night. Every night for the rest of that week, Jane Roe slept at Plaintiff’s apartment and they engaged in consensual sexual activity. Within that first week, Plaintiff and Jane Roe agreed to be “exclusive” and tell people they were “dating.” Within two weeks of dating, Plaintiff and Jane Roe were saying “I love you” to each other. Almost every night for the remainder of the Autumn Quarter, Jane Roe slept in Plaintiff’s bed at Plaintiff’s apartment. Most nights, and often times during the day, Plaintiff and Jane Roe engaged in consensual sexual activity.
Jane Files Complaint on April 5, 2018. Jane falsely accuses John of domestic violence and sexual misconduct.
Evidence of John’s Innocence Includes: Jane Roe’s text messages to a non-UC friend stating: 1. that she “hooked up” with John again, “but like we can’t tell anyone” because “we both said shit to our friends and they’d be pissed if they knew we went back to each other in any capacity,” 2. sex with John was “good,” 3. that “I just might use him for sex when I want it and have no emotional connection” and Jane Roe’s testimony that during this time, 4. “I was just letting him buy me food and was having sex with him, to satisfy my own desires, as I knew he would be willing” and 5. Jane’s admission that she was lying to her UC friends about her consensual sexual relationship for fear that they would be mad that she had re-kindled a relationship with her ex-boyfriend.
UChicago Emotional Torture of John: UC disregarded this and all other exculpatory evidence supporting John Doe’s vehement denials of wrongful conduct and accepted Jane Roe’s unsupported accusations for no reason other than the fact that John is male and Jane is female. As a result of Jane Roe’s false and defamatory allegations and UC’s discriminatory conduct, John Doe’s life has been shattered. He lost the college degree and job he earned. His future economic opportunities have been crippled. His reputation has been destroyed, having been brandished a rapist. And, he suffers from extreme depression, anxiety, emotional distress and suicidal ideation from the stress and humiliation inflicted on him.
Read it: Doe v UChicago & Jane Roe
