DARTMOUTH Plays ‘Whack-a-Mole’ w Male. Ex-Girlfriend & her Mom Seek Revenge. Doe Loses Scholarship. He’s Expelled & Traumatized. His Family’s in Counseling. Doe Sues.
An expelled male from Dartmouth is suing the trustees of Dartmouth college. Between 2012 and January 2017, John Doe was in a relationship with accuser, Sally Smith. In March 2017, Sally Smith’s mother told Doe and his mother that Sally Smith and herself ‘intended to entice Dartmouth into imposing a disciplinary sanction upon Doe to get revenge upon him for grievances they held against him, in hopes that Doe would become ineligible to keep the full ride scholarship he’d been awarded’…Dartmouth’s Judicial Affairs Office (“JAO”) investigated the contents of the 18 pg. report Sally submitted and determined it was not appropriate to initiate disciplinary allegations against Doe. Sally and her mother were unhappy and repeatedly contacted Dartmouth College saying they felt threatened by Doe. Doe sent a text message to Sally and her mother: “I just wanted to write and formally remind you one more time that you’re not allowed to talk to any of my family members.” Shortly afterwards, Sally’s mother went to the police. John Doe was arrested that day by the Hanover Police Department.
When Dartmouth’s Undergraduate Dean Kristi Clemens called Doe’s parents to tell them John had been expelled, Doe’s parents asked why Dartmouth was now punishing him so harshly. Clemens replied, ‘he wasn’t remorseful enough’ and ‘this justified imposing such a harsh sanction upon Doe’…John Doe persistently tried to present evidence showing Dartmouth’s employees had failed to conduct their duties. Over the course of his entire disciplinary process, not a single Dartmouth employee was able to reconcile an understanding of what transpired during his disciplinary proceedings that is consistent with the pertinent facts and evidence’ According to the complaint, ‘The evidence will show that Dartmouth’s employees and “supervisors” were playing a game of Whack-a-Mole with Doe; they would fabricate one narrative that justified his expulsion and the inappropriate decisions and rulings that’d been made by the individuals managing his case, and when he would try to dispel it, they would then come up with another reason.’ Doe’s complaint talks about the emotional trauma he has endured, ‘As a result of Dartmouth’s actions, plaintiff has been put through excruciating suffering, required extensive psychiatric and medical support, and been diagnosed with debilitating depression – problems Doe had never experienced before this incident and subjected to this preposterous, torturous treatment and process. John has nightmares and flashbacks of the events described here and suffers other symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder associated with them. At least three of Doe’s different family members have sought psychological therapy or counselling because of the intense pain and trauma they have experienced alongside Doe over these events.
‘Plaintiff seeks justice against Dartmouth as it is responsible for: the actions of a small group of administrators and employees who failed and refused to adhere to the College’s own policies and laws meant to protect Plaintiff.’ Plaintiff has been subjected to extraordinary suffering and loss as a result of Dartmouth’s actions, including but not limited to the loss of his Dartmouth degree, loss of other educational opportunities, loss of job opportunities, reputational harm, financial harm, and excruciating emotional distress. Plaintiff seeks to hold Dartmouth College liable for these catastrophic injuries and asks for a jury verdict to revendicate his life.
I encourage reporters to contact John Doe because his complaint is riddled with too many devious acts and injustices. More than SOS can mention in this space. Doe’s email is listed on the Dartmouth Complaint as: jd2018265
@gmail.com
