MALES Don’t Apply Here

Virginia Tech, Occidental, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Harvard, UVA, USC, SMU, UNC, the State of New York, Colorado, Illinois, Virginia, Minnesota, California and Connecticut. These colleges and states have passed laws that are extremely biased against males. As anti-due process and anti-male continues, this list grows.

PENN STATE: Judge Approves Accused’s Due Process Case Against Penn State Officials

, , , /

PENN STATE: Judge Approves Accused’s Due Process Case Against Penn State Officials

 

Last summer, a federal judge stopped Pennsylvania State University from suspending a male student it found responsible for sexual assault. The university had blocked “almost all” of the questions “John Doe” submitted and it refused to require his accuser to ever provide a written statement laying out her allegations. Horrifyingly, its Title IX investigator had actually redacted Doe’s responses for the Title IX hearing panel, in the name of objectivity…Last Monday, U.S. District Judge Brann rejected the university’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Doe’s Title IX claim only survives because his allegations – that only male students have been punished for sexual misconduct, and are “invariably found guilty” regardless of evidence – are just enough for Brann to “infer that PSU’s disciplinary process is tainted by anti-male bias”

thecollegefix.com By Greg Piper

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
‘D’ FOR PRINCETON: Title IX Proceedings Immensely Less Fair than the Honor Code

, , , , /

‘D’ FOR PRINCETON: Title IX Proceedings Immensely Less Fair than the Honor Code

Princeton’s Title IX proceedings offer less procedural fairness and fewer due process protections than the Honor system does. The Honor Committee utilizes a higher burden of proof to determine if a violation has occurred than does the Title IX panel. The Honor Committee also requires that a higher percentage of its members vote to find a student responsible for the student to be convicted than does Title IX.  FIRE recently issued a report on due process that gave Princeton a ‘D’ rating for the lack of due process and fairness in its handling of sexual misconduct cases. For all of the same arguments about fairness, justice, and the possibility of disparate impacts on different University populations that students made in favor of Honor Code reform, the fundamental unfairness of Princeton’s Title IX proceedings is deeply troubling.

dailyprincetonian.com

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
NO JUSTICE for Males at Oberlin College. Prompts Lawsuits, Due Process Concerns

, , , /

NO JUSTICE for Males at Oberlin College. Prompts Lawsuits, Due Process Concerns

Ohio’s Oberlin College boasts a conviction rate for students accused of sexual assault that would make Vladimir Putin blush. A lawsuit filed last year by a student expelled from Oberlin reveals that every student who went through the college’s formal sexual assault adjudication process was found responsible on at least one count. William A. Jacobson, a professor at Cornell Law School said the conviction rate “calls into question whether Oberlin’s sexual assault hearings amounted to nothing more than show trials in which the accused were presumed guilty.”

washingtontimes.com By Bradford Richardson

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
USC: CA Judge Leans in-Believes Title IX Accusation Over Facts

, , , , /

USC: CA Judge Leans in-Believes Title IX Accusation Over Facts

L.A. Superior Court Judge Amy Hogue said she is leaning toward denying former USC kicker Matt Boermeester’s petition for reinstatement to USC in the face of a Title IX domestic violence allegation involving his girlfriend, Zoe Katz. Boermeester’s lawyer, Mark Hathaway said a surveillance video of the encounter exonerated his client, and said Katz repeatedly denied making the statements attributed to her and that she and his client walked away from the incident holding hands. He described both Boermeester and Katz as two athletes at the top of their game who are strong physically and mentally.

sfvmedia.com

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
MALES BEWARE: Major Blow to Due Process @University of Maryland

, , /

MALES BEWARE: Major Blow to Due Process @University of Maryland

The University of Maryland Senate recently voted to lower the standard of evidence in student misconduct hearings while simultaneously limiting students’ access to attorneys. Edward Priola, a UMD faculty Senator who voted against the measure, said he has deep reservations about the changes, which he called “a systematic dismantling, from my observation, of due process and the civil rights of students.” Priola says that the SCC sees attorneys as “scary to the students who are sitting on the board of discipline,” and does not want the students who are participating in those disciplinary hearings to be intimidated.

campusreform.org By Adam Sabes

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
6THCIRCUIT Judge Eviscerates Denison’s Lawyer over Pre-Determined Guilt of Accused Male

, , , , /

6THCIRCUIT Judge Eviscerates Denison’s Lawyer over Pre-Determined Guilt of Accused Male

The 6th Circuit was hearing a case against Ohio’s private Denison University, which expelled a male student after his female sex partner accused him of nonconsensual sex stemming from another male student spiking her alcoholic drink. Circuit Judge Thapar rebuffed Denison lawyer Natalie McLaughlin for implying that Denison can get off the hook for discrimination against males by claiming that it might get sued by female accusers as well. “Counsel, universities have a tough road to hoe but what they can’t do is discriminate, whether it’s against whites, blacks, women, men.”

thecollegefix.com By Greg Piper

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
EXPELLED Male Sues Oberlin: Claims Every Accused College Student Is Found Guilty.

, , , /

EXPELLED Male Sues Oberlin: Claims Every Accused College Student Is Found Guilty.

A male student, John Doe, was expelled from Oberlin campus in October 2016 for alleged sexual assault. Doe has filed a federal lawsuit against Oberlin, and contains allegations which, if proven, reflect that Oberlin’s system for adjudicating sexual assault accusations was fundamentally biased against males, at least during the 2015-2016 academic year. The details of the sexual encounter and recriminations are all too familiar to anyone who has read the complaints being filed around the country regarding higher education sexual assault adjudications. The encounter started as consensual by everyone’s account…

legalinsurrection.com By William A. Jacobson John-Doe-v-Oberlin-Complaint

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
DUE PROCESS Matters. He Was Always Innocent, She Accused Falsely, and the Jury Agreed.

, , , , /

DUE PROCESS Matters. He Was Always Innocent, She Accused Falsely, and the Jury Agreed.

Nearly four years ago, Mr. Robinson was [falsely] accused of sex assault at the College of Charleston after a night of drinking. He was arrested, labeled a rapist and thrown out of the school…But it took a jury about 28 minutes to acquit Robinson recently, and cleared him of any criminal wrongdoing. In his lawyers’ eyes, his case illustrates how an intense nationwide focus on sexual assault and harassment, particularly involving college students and celebrities, is breeding ignorance of due process standards. “It felt like a cloud over my head was lifted,” Robinson said of his experience. “Finally, somebody listened to me and believed me.- My emotions unleashed, and I just cried,” he said.

postandcourier.com By Andrew Knapp

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
COMPASSION For Brock Turner

, , , , /

COMPASSION For Brock Turner

I have compassion for Brock Turner. Why? Because 1) I have a caring heart and 2) I took the time to read the Brock Turner Truth website. This website presents factual information about Mr. Turner’s Stanford court case, and the players/officials involved. Volunteers and concerned citizens created the website because they are appalled at the unrelenting viscous mis-information campaign directed at Mr.Turner and his court case. Many journalists/bloggers haven’t taken the time to look at the facts of Turner’s case, and the media have been remiss in editing out important details and facts surrounding the events of Mr. Turner’s case. If journalists take time to read http://www.brockturnertruth.com/putting-it-in-perspective- it will clarify why Mr. Turner is appealing his case.

“I don’t want him to feel like his life is over and I don’t want him to rot in jail.  He does not need to be behind bars.”   Statement by Jane Doe

I have compassion in my heart for Brock Turner because I care. He should not have to endure bloodthristy cancerous hate 24/7, nor should his family be subjected to a continuous stream of vicious mob attacks. The merciless attacks on Mr. Turner’s family should cease, and if people actually read the enormous amount of factual information about his case, they would have compassion for Brock Turner too, and understand why he is appealing.

-Alice True

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
UCSF FIRED Title IX Cristina Perez-Abelson for Falsifying Records, Hiding Files

, , , /

UCSF FIRED Title IX Cristina Perez-Abelson for Falsifying Records, Hiding Files

UCSF fired the head of its sexual harassment prevention office last spring after determining that she ordered an employee to falsify dates on complaints to make it appear that they were handled more efficiently.  In June 2016, someone called UC’s whistle-blower hotline and said Perez-Abelson had “repeatedly instructed staff to cover up and put inaccurate dates” on the cases they were investigating. Perez-Abelson denied the findings and called the investigation process inadequate. [..That’s calling the kettle black]

sfchronicle.com By Nanette Asimov

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter
«< 25 26 27 28 29 >»