BAD RULING: NY Punts On Substantially Hearsay

The best part of the New York Court of Appeals memorandum opinion in Haug v. SUNY Potsdam is that it’s thankfully short. A wag might contend that its brevity is due to the fact that the rationale was so thin, so shallow, that there were simply no more words to offer.

simplejustice.us By Scott Greenfield

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter