CORNELL’s Title IX is ‘Perverse & Bizarre’- Judge Stops Suspension

A male found guilty by Cornell of sexually assaulting a female could be back on campus because a judge temporarily barred the University from suspending him. Unbelievably, Cornell also slapped a second guilty finding against John Doe. Cornell ruled that the male student accused the female student of sexual assault as “a tactical maneuver and in bad faith.” The panel said the male student, in claiming that Roe had initiated sex without his affirmative consent, had put Roe “through the proverbial wringer” and that it constituted retaliation, prohibited by Cornell policy…John Doe’s lawsuit alleges both that Cornell arbitrarily and prejudicially departed from its own policies and that Cornell’s findings of guilt are unsupported by the available evidence. By Drew Musto

Share this:Tweet about this on Twitter