Fifty years ago a white woman accused 14 year old black Emmett Till of sexual assault. It turns out her accusation was false, Throughout America, college campuses are reliving the Jim Crow South where black men stereotyped as rapists were lynched by the Ku Klux Klan. Today at colleges when a white female accuses a black male of assaulting her, Title IX teaches (religiously) that she is to be believed. This brazen and radical feminist stance of ‘believe’ is leading to hundreds of innocent males being Title9 falsely accused, expelled and denied a college education for life. Many of the accused males are black without resources to defend their innocence. Below are true stories of alleged campus sexual assaults involving white girls who Title9 accuse blacks. ALL BLACKS WERE Denied a FAIR HEARING, Denied DUE PROCESS, and denied the PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE.
Sacred Heart University: White Female and 2 Black Males have consenting sex, She cries rape. 2 BLACKS EXPELLED White Female is charged w making a false allegation. 2 Black Males never get their college education or scholarship back.
Florida State University: White Female and Black Male athlete have consenting sex. Female accuses. Black Male is found innocent three times. White Female shifts story, contradicts evidence. White Female seeks celebrity and $$ while BLACK MALE IS SLANDERED.
False accusations exist. Due Process is essential for justice. Alice
Blog, Personal Stories
Original content by contributors to Save our Sons, Personal stories written by the falsely accused and their familes
Young innocent accused college men describe traumatic investigations, and the aftermath of their shattered minds and lives. “Can you imagine coming out to your family under the pretenses you’re accused of sexual assault and you’re found guilty? During the investigation, I knew my family would be there to support me, but I could not imagine coming out to them twice: first, as an alleged rapist and second, as someone who is gay.
thedailybeast.com By Emily Shire
Important Lawsuit Seeks to Hold College Accountable for its Unfair and Harmful Disciplinary Action Filed on April 4, 2017
When a college student is accused of misconduct, he or she is entitled to a fair investigation, and if a disciplinary hearing is warranted, a fair proceeding. When such a student is denied a fair review and hearing of serious misconduct allegations, the consequences may be life altering and devastating.
Far too often, college administrators who receive complaints of misconduct pre-judge guilt based on stereotypes that arise merely from the type of allegations that are made, regardless of the facts. Charged with an obligation to swiftly and harshly punish misconduct, they often decide the “case” without a real investigation, evidence or a hearing of any kind. And when they do so, they do so quickly, arbitrarily punishing the accused students on an interim and permanent basis. The range of punishments routinely doled out in such circumstances often includes expulsions or suspensions, and an obligation on the part of the accused student to report the fact that he or she suffered severe punishment for a disciplinary violation. When applying to graduate school or for employment a report of these disciplinary sanctions on the accused student’s record more often than not, destroys their candidacy for admission or the hiring they seek.
In many unfair disciplinary cases, the college officials in question circumvent established, mandatory disciplinary policies and procedures that are published by the college for the purpose of ensuring fairness. The only way this type of unfairness and the devastation it causes can be corrected, is through legal action. Legal action that holds accountable those colleges who punish students unfairly and unlawfully will serve as a reminder to all colleges that they must protect the rights of complaining students, and accused students, and ensure that fairness always prevails.
On April 4, 2017, Chaiken & Chaiken, P.C. , joined by Friedman, Suder & Cooke, P.C. filed a lawsuit against the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA), alleging that school officials unfairly mishandled a student’s misconduct complaint against another student, and ignored the rights of the accused student to a fair review and response to the allegations against him. The lawsuit charges that despite knowing the matter involved Title IX issues, the two UTA officials handling the complaint circumvented UTA’s mandatory Title IX investigation and hearing procedures. These mandatory procedures require a fair and impartial investigation by a Title IX investigator, and a hearing before a neutral hearing officer.
The lawsuit further charges that upon circumventing these mandatory procedures, the same two UTA officials severely punished the accused student on an immediate, interim basis, without conducting a proper investigation. Ultimately, a few days after the complaint was made, and again without a proper investigation, they chose to punish him on a permanent basis. Inexplicably, they did so despite acknowledging in emails to each other that there was no evidence to support the allegations against him, or the punishment they meted out, nevertheless. Tragically, the embarrassment, stress, mental anguish and damage to reputation suffered by the accused young man, and the fear that this unfair disciplinary sanction would prevent him from attending graduate school or finding a job, caused him to take his own life.
This important case serves to remind us that fairness in disciplinary proceedings on college campuses is not a given, even when the colleges’ policies and procedures say otherwise. Those who are accused of misconduct on campus find themselves in the midst of a true legal crisis with devastating potential consequences, if they do not navigate the intricacies of campus disciplinary procedures in a manner that invokes their rights to fairness. Only when students and their families understand this reality, and the need to take specific action to invoke the rights that are designed to protect fairness in campus misconduct cases, can tragic consequences be avoided.
This case report and complaint was sent to Alice from Attorney Kenneth Chaiken.
Thank you for bringing this terrible injustice of an innocent life now gone to my attention. For inquiries about this case contact: Kenneth Chaiken 214/722-9494
Parents of innocent accused sons are often crying inside for years as they try to help their young sons heal after they are treated cruelly and unjustly by Title IX. Title IX hearings are not about seeking truth when a sex accusation is made. Title IX is about cruelty towards the minority gender on campuses. Males.
New lawsuits appear weekly from accused males who have been bullied, abused and denied due process by Title IX. And thanks to Obama’s 2011 DCL, Title IX is very successful in expelling/suspending/denying an education to hundreds of males. Once accused, males are isolated from their friends, and told they cannot speak to anyone at the school about the accusation. As a result, these young 17-24 year old males are emotional wrecks for years, lending to suicidal thoughts, hospitalization or both.
I hear from these males and their parents, and below is a sampling of their suffering. Because this information is so personal, I’ve simplified the stories by removing details to protect identities.
My son suffers from panic attacks regularly.
My son has PTSD.
My son confessed to me that suicide crossed his mind more than once.
My son was suicidal but fortunately not successful thanks to friends.
My friend’s son was hospitalized for suicidal thoughts and he is still in therapy.
My son is too distressed to talk to me.
My son’s spirit was damaged. I worried he might go down a black hole of depression. He barely ate or slept for months.
My son was deeply depressed for a long time and he still can’t discuss his experience with us.
My son committed suicide. Later on his accuser wanted to meet with me. She told me she was sorry for accusing my son. She was trying make another guy jealous.
The whole thing is a profoundly isolating experience.
I felt I was in a black hole.
Two years ago a my son committed suicide. His accuser later recanted.
My son was put on suicide watch at Occidental College. His friends were scared that he might hurt himself when he was removed from his dorm room and put in isolation. His friends called the suicide watch line, and for 24 hours my son had guards outside his room.
It’s been three years since my son was falsely accused, but he recently told me how dark his days had been, and how dark they still are at times. He also told me he considered killing himself during those dark days three years ago, and my husband and I never knew.
During my son’s Title IX hearing we told the college we were very afraid that our son would take his own life.
A lawyer told me that he takes phone calls 24/7 from college males who are suicidal as a result of being falsely accused.
The emotional toll of a false accusation on families and their son is immense. The psychological trauma is unbearable for these young college males, and thankfully many do not commit suicide, but the wounds are deep and permanent. The scars that these innocent men carry are intensely private and we must help them heal by offering a hand up, by preserving the presumption of innocence, and by demanding due process. If we do not, America is to blame.
I am calling on Mother’s with sons to rise up and fight against the suffocating Title IX accusation persecution of college males. Title IX offers no protection for your son, and in this era of fake news college feminists want you to believe otherwise. There are NO RIGHTS FOR COLLEGE MALES to defend their innocence once accused.
Today is the day to contact these leaders, Betsy DeVos and Senator Tom Lankford. They will defend campus due process. They will reign in Title IX that masquerades as protection for your son. Title IX denies your college son due process rights and mothers you must rise up and stop the bleeding if you want your son to get his college degree.
Your voice counts. Call Senator Tom Lankford #202-224-5754. Say thank you for standing up to Dept. of Education’s illegal practices and for reigning in an out of control agency. This Senator Could Help College Regain Sanity
In 2014 John Doe was expelled from Swarthmore College, and then sued Swarthmore under Title IX. After John-Doe-vs-Swarthmore was filed Swarthmore said “additional information became available which both parties believe raises questions about the impartiality of the college judiciary committee panel that heard John’s case. On the basis of this new information, John has requested that the college vacate the panel’s findings and sanction. The college agrees that the new information raises sufficient questions about the fairness of the hearing to warrant vacating the panel’s findings and sanction.” After this, the federal judge in the case agreed to a joint motion from the college and the student to dismiss the lawsuit.
2011-2016 will be remembered by many college males as years of being unjustly and unfairly persecuted for innocent actions and words. The constant and aggressive attacks on college males in the form of false accusations is downright shameful. Title IX is often used as an anti-male bully club to deny hundreds of males their college degrees. Even Forbes magazine acknowledges that males are an endangered species on college campuses. These years will also be remembered for turning progressive leaning college males into conservatives for life, my son included.
It is my hope that 2017 will quickly usher in much needed campus sanity, fairness and due process. Starting with the repeal of the 2011 DCL. If you want to be a voice for campus change begin here by telling our President-Elect Donald Trump to repeal the 2011 DCL. https://apply.ptt.gov/yourstory/
Thank you, Alice True
With President-elect Donald Trump, advocates for due process have a much better chance of being heard. The Trump transition team is asking you to tell your story and voice your concerns here: https://apply.ptt.gov/yourstory/ Collectively we can tell the stories of our sons and daughters being denied due process rights when falsely accused of campus sexual assault and then unjustly expelled by a Title IX kangaroo court. Together we can ask President-elect Donald Trump to:
- Revoke the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter.
- Return due process to all accused students on college campuses:
- All evidence must be provided to the accused.
- Restore right to cross-examination.
- Adjudication hearing should be by panel of peers, rejecting the single-adjudicator model.
- End immediate removal of accused students unless charged by police, restoring principle of innocent until proven guilty.
- Move OCR under the Dept. of Justice.
- Reject victim-centered (believe the accuser) sexual assault investigations.
- First amendment free speech standards should apply on all campuses, such that students are free from harrassment for personal political views.
Friends of SOS, we can make a difference for our falsely accused college students, please take action.
Gratefully, Alice True
I receive emails from many who are falsely accused. I am often saddened at the manipulative nature of the accusers, and shocked by the powerful Title IX gender specialists who think every female accusation is true, and treat every accused college male as a sexual deviant. The gender specialists are Title IX snake charmers hypnotizing young college girls to believe they’ve been assaulted when they haven’t. Young accused men are denied their college degree, they are isolated from their college community and sports teams, they are denied access to college dining halls, denied access to professors, denied access to the library, and viciously shamed into a rubble of manhood. Accusers rarely call the police or seek a rape kit. Accusers always call the Title IX snake charmers. Below are some of the accusations that I know.
A male is studying in the library for an exam and is staring off into the distance. A girl in the library files a Title IX complaint because he stared too long in her direction. He is suspended for one year, and can not be on campus. Title IX says staring is sexual assault.
A High School male senior is accepted to college and ready to enroll in classes during the summer. The male is informed that his HS ex-girlfriend (who is not going to college) called his college to say her ‘rapist’ is coming to their college. The male can not register, or move into his dorm, while Title IX investigates this girl’s accusation of a kiss that happened not at college, but at HS 200 miles away. The young male’s life was in turmoil and nearly ruined before he even began college. A lawyer had to be retained for true justice. Title IX says sexual assault includes believing an accusation from a jealous HS girl made against a rising freshman.
In 2011 a male broke up with his girlfriend through texting. She filed a Title IX complaint. The girl’s father is a Professor at the college. The male was expelled and denied an education. Years later the girl admitted she lied and signed a notarized document stating that the male never assaulted her. The male is still being denied his college education. Title IX says sexual assault includes revenge from an ex-girlfriend.
In 2013 a sophomore male had consensual sex with a freshman female. “The freshmen class was subject to a new political order, and it really had an effect on the impressionable women…these young girls were so unsure of themselves and how to maintain adult encounters with mutual emotional respect that the only way they could assert their identity was through rash and damaging behavior.” The female filed a Title IX complaint. The male was expelled, denied his education, and still can not transfer to another college. Title IX says sexual assault includes consensual sex.
In 2014 during a family neighborhood gathering a girl pursued a guy who already had a girlfriend. For a year this girl ignored the guy’s wishes who kept saying he had a girlfriend. In 2015 the guy finally got through to the girl. Five months later the girl filed a Title IX complaint for an ‘assault’ that happened 150 miles away in 2014 during the family gathering. The male was suspended a year before graduation. The girl then brought her accusation to the male’s work place. He was fired. This male lost his scholarships, education, degree, and employment. Title IX says sexual assault includes females who are denied the attention of males.
In 2015 a girl asked a guy to take class notes for her, After a month the guy realized he was being used and told the girl he was not going to be taking notes for her anymore. She told him if he stopped taking her class notes, she would accuse him of sexual assault. The guy continued taking her class notes for fear of being accused by her. Title IX says sexual assault includes females threatening males to do what they say or else.
To be continued…
Will someone please shoot an arrow of truth at the bubble of lies that surround the White House regarding campus sexual assault? Today I read that Obama and Biden are threatening to boycott colleges that do not take campus sexual assault seriously.
It is difficult for me to stomach that the President I vigorously campaigned and voted for lives in a White House bubble encircled by staff who fabricate the truth regarding campus sexual assault. My President continues to resist facts, scientific data, and essentially denies to witness the truth that innocent men are being unjustly expelled and denied an education at the mere mention of an accusation. Meanwhile activists shame feminists and researchers who prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the campus rape epidemic is a myth. President Obama and Vice President Biden might boycott colleges for low numbers, but there is a simple reason that colleges are not producing high numbers of reported sexual assaults, it is because A CAMPUS RAPE EPIDEMIC DOES NOT EXIST.
FACTS. Just the facts.
David Lisak is promoted as ‘the’ campus rape expert based on his 2002 serial predator theory of campus rape. Lisak’s work is often cited by White House officials, but there is not a single statement in Lisak’s paper about assaults taking place on or near a campus; there is not a single reference to the campus environment. When researcher Linda LaFauve asked Lisak ‘whether they were about campus sexual assault; he conceded they were not’. “There is, in fact, no foundation for the connection between Lisak’s paper and higher education. This point cannot be emphasized enough. Nothing about the studies from which he repurposed data depended on survey respondents being students, or acts they reported taking place while in college.”
Personally, I am embarrassed for my extremely educated President. He is blind to the fact that Lisak’s study does not pertain to campus sex assaults. But “if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Researcher LeFauve proves beyond a show of doubt that there is no direct connection to campus sexual assault and Lisak’s study. Yet today, President Obama is threatening colleges based upon a debunked campus rape study. Can this arrow of truth pierce the White House bubble?
Department of Justice states that the rate of rape and sexual assault was 1.2 times higher for non students than for college students. Drink it up. Non college students are more at risk than college students. DOJ scientific data proves beyond a shadow of doubt the rape rate is 1 in 52. Could this arrow of truth, of 1 in 52, make a dent in the White house bubble of fabricated rape statistics?
“YOU can’t handle the truth”
Women and men are speaking out sourcing research and scientific data to refute false statements about the myth of a campus rape epidemic. But when the truth of factual data is voiced, activists scramble to discredit their words and character.
One woman who spoke such truths was slapped with a lawsuit for doing so. Social scientist and researcher Professor Mary Koss shed light on David Lisak’s study. Koss and five other researchers made a startling discovery about the assumption that most campus rapists are serial perpetrators as put forth by Lisak. “The ubiquitous theory-constantly cited by activists, policymakers, and even the Obama White House-was false”. New data just didn’t support it. Koss’ research was much more comprehensive and she expected Lisak and his cohorts to accept the new research and adjust accordingly. “Old assumptions are constantly tested against new data, and abandoned when they prove faulty.” But this did not happen. “There’s been a scientific misconduct case filed against us” revealed Koss
Recently, Andrew Cavarno, a college student at UC Santa Barbara, spoke against beliefs regarding sexual assault on campuses. “There is absolutely no evidence of a rape epidemic on college campuses, the word epidemic implies that there’s a sudden wave of sexual violence, or that things are getting worse – this is just not the case.” Indeed Cavarno is factually correct, yet UCSB provided safe spaces for college students who were triggered by the truth.
In Wendy McElroy’s book, Rape Culture Hysteria: Fixing the Damage Done to Men and Women she writes “There is no rape culture in North America”. The idea is a “particularly vicious fiction because it brands half the human race – males, and especially white males – as rapists or rape facilitators,” she says. “This slander would be denounced as hate speech if it were directed at any other class of human being, such as blacks, gays or women. The Big Lie about rape culture contains all the crucial elements: brashness, sincerity and repetitiveness, and it plays off the emotional and justice-driven agenda of people.”
THREE arrows of truth: Solutions to burst the bubble.
1) FACE (Families Advocating for Campus Equality) has requested to meet with President Obama and Vice President Biden numerous times. As of today, FACE has not met with either. An arrow of truth to burst the bubble would be if these powerful men would sit down with the FACE victims of false allegations and listen. FACE victims are the women and men who are falsely accused, and in spite of being harassed, beaten up, shamed, wrongfully expelled and denied an education they strive to heal.
2) Is President Obama aware of the three lawsuit filed against his Dept. of Education for their illegal mandates? The first lawsuit was filed by Georgia state lawmaker Earl Earhart for what he calls “illegal and unconstitutional directives” from the Education Department. The second lawsuit was filed by Grant Neal who says his school dramatically overreached by kicking him out of school without due process, and says the school was pressured to act the way it did because of illegal pressure from the Obama administration. Neal is suing his college, the Secretary of Education John King and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The third lawsuit was filed by the country’s biggest advocate for civil liberties on U.S. campuses. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is backing a lawsuit by John Doe, a former UVA law student. Doe and FIRE are going after the Obama administration, challenging the Department of Education’s unlawful mandate that colleges abandon due process protections and try sexual misconduct cases using the lowest standard of evidence.
3) In anticipation for reauthorizing the Higher Education Act of 1965, SAVE (Stop Abusive and Violent Environments) designed a model bill to bring fairness to the campus sexual assault issue. Titled the Campus Equality, Fairness, and Transparency Act (CEFTA) the model bill supports the rights and interests of both the complainant and accused student, and encourages the involvement of local criminal justice (which has more expertise than campus tribunals) to get involved in such cases.
CAN the arrows of truth hit their mark?
As long as President Obama is surrounded by staff who fabricate the truth about campus sexual assault the arrows of truth will bounce off the White House bubble.
- It would be courageous for the President to meet with FACE and the victims of false accusations and listen.
- It would be a daring move if the President reigned in his Deptartment of Education’s illegal over-reach.
- It would be bold if my President supported the Campus Equality, Fairness, and Transparency Act.
Perhaps I live in my own bubble, where I am often exposed to the pain and heartbreak of (mostly) young men suffering from the injustice of this collective hysteria. But I must believe that the arrows of truth could break the bubble of fabricated truths that surround the White House, and soon all of us who are fighting for the fair and equal treatment of college students will unify together.
This is my own story of what happened when the phone rang late one night.
..”don’t worry Mom, I’m fine but I’ve been taken out of my dorm room and moved elsewhere…. A girl and I had sex a few weeks ago, … she filed a complaint against me…. She agreed to have sex, I have it in writing,… I don’t know why she filed. Also Mom, I’m on suicide watch.”
That’s how my family’s nightmare began.
Initially I wanted to run and be on campus with him. He was a first year student. Who did he know that could be his protector against such an unfounded lie from this college girl?
Well I slowly learned over the months, that the college would do nothing to help my son through their Kafkaesque college investigation and hearing process. But the college would do everything and more, to help the girl in all ways possible, at all times. When we asked to see what the charges were, or other pertinent questions we were met with no comment, or you have to figure that out for yourself. Thankfully, we had an attorney who communicated with the college. Often he didn’t succeed any better than we did in obtaining information about the upcoming hearing, but we could commiserate together at the brazenness and arrogance of the college. In the months leading up to the hearing, I was thinking, this is my 18 year old son and this is how you treat one of your finest and brightest students? How dare you. You trample on his rights, your treat him as dangerous, and act as if he’s guilty before the college hearing even takes place? Before you review the evidence? Shame on you!
I think this was my biggest faux pas. I believed that the college, as an educational institution teaching truth and justice, would do the right thing. Act in a fair and impartial manner, as one would do in a court of law. I actually assumed they would look at the facts, and based on those facts, find my son innocent. I was naive. I didn’t know that the college had already pre-determined that my son was guilty, right at the moment the girl filed her complaint.
So it didn’t matter that a criminal investigation cleared my son, or that the police looked at the evidence and didn’t press charges or that witnesses offered to testify for my son. It really didn’t matter what evidence we had to prove his innocence, because the adjudicator refused to allow most of my son’s evidence into the college hearing. But what did matter at the college hearing was that the girl had as many staff around her as she needed to keep her upright and hold her hand. So that during the daylong hearing, she and her female friends could unleash their hatred at my son for his alleged assault and spew their fear-based, anti-male words at my son. He most certainly got a hysterical feminist tongue lashing from the staff, and also from the pitiful weak minded wounded girls (includes one of her witnesses.) Of course my son was shaken up. Who wants to be trapped in a room with girls yelling vicious lies at you for seven hours?
And of course, he must sit still, listen and take it. No rebuttal.
It is an unimaginable process that these college hearings engage in. Many of my son’s rights were denied. He didn’t have the right to review the evidence, or to question the witnesses, little cross examination was allowed, and he was denied his due process rights. Basically, this was not a fair and impartial college hearing; also his attorney wasn’t allowed in the hearing room; but of course college staff were permitted in the hearing room to sit and coddle the girl. And most of the staff supporting her had law degrees. Many constitutional rights were denied to my son. These are horrific college hearings. They’ll never be exposed properly. But in time I do hope reason and fairness will win and college boys will have their constitutional rights upheld in the future.
When the finding of guilt was emailed to my son, we were shocked. His friends were in disbelief. The sly adjudicator twisted words and logic into a pretzel, and found my loving, generous, handsome and kind-hearted son guilty. This injustice was very hard to take, and my son’s education, and successful future, has faltered because of this girl’s false accusation. She continues her education in college, very much in la-la land, insulated by neo-feminists, and wrapped in her own lie and label.
Today we continue to be in legal proceedings with the college, where their goal is to delay proceedings, and run us into the ground financially. But when you have an innocent son, nothing stops a mother from fighting for truth and justice.
– Mother of a falsely accused son,
Still fighting, having filed a lawsuit against the college for violating his rights three years ago