“Recently, Inside Higher Ed published a story regarding the University System of Georgia (USG) that contained significant misinformation about the USG’s Title IX and student conduct policies. As the Title IX Administrator for the University System of Georgia, here is my response to set the record straight regarding our commitment to campus safety and to ensure consistency and quality in student conduct investigations across the University System.” -Kimberly Ballard-Washington, associate vice chancellor USG
Monthly Archives: August 2017
The sexual assault charges brought against former Cornell basketball forward Xavier Eaglin ’19 in March 2016 have been dismissed. Although Eaglin no longer faces criminal charges, he will not be able to return to Cornell. After his arrest, Eaglin was dismissed from the basketball team and banned from campus. He spent seven days in jail before he was bailed out by his parents and then returned home. “We are just thankful justice prevailed and that we can start repairing our lives,” said Eaglin’s mother Clara Eaglin.
cornellsun.com By Anna Delwiche
A former member of the Texas A&M University Corps of Cadets filed a federal Title IX lawsuit against the university, alleging A&M officials violated his due-process rights by showing a male gender bias. The suit claims that John Doe was wrongfully accused of sexual misconduct by a female member of the Corps of Cadets and that the Title IX investigative process took place while Doe was hospitalized for treatment of depression without giving him an adequate chance to defend himself.
wacotrib.com By T. Witherspoon
It is not often that the veil of university Title IX procedures is lifted, but when it is, as described in Zoe Katz’s heartfelt letter regarding her Orwellian experience at the University of Southern California, the public captures a glimpse of the dystopian inner workings of a system designed to “help” victims of sexual assault.
washingtonexaminer.com by Cynthia P. Garrett and Alison Scott
Mary Zolkowski, a Michigan college student was charged Monday after she falsely reported to campus police that she was attacked and raped. Police said she told them that the suspect was an acquaintance. Mary said she didn’t give consent because she was too intoxicated. She also refused a physical examination. Facts proved that this was a false college rape accusation and Zolkowski was arraigned for one count of false report of a felony.
nypost.com ByJackie Salo
Over the past six years, students who believe they were falsely accused of sexual assault have sued colleges. On average, United Educators and colleges ended up paying $187,000 per case. In 40 percent of the cases, institutions were out more than $200,000. In nearly 60 percent of the accused-student cases reviewed, at least one of the students involved had consumed alcohol.
chronicle.com By Sarah Brown
The U.S. Department of Education on Friday asked a federal court to put on hold for 90 days a lawsuit challenging hotly contested guidance from the Obama administration on campus sexual-assault policy, while the department reviews the guidance that is being challenged. The motion stated that the government had consulted with lawyers for the plaintiffs, who did not oppose the request.
chronicle.com By Nick DeSantis
He got her verbal consent “more than four hours” after her last drink. He convinced an investigator she was mentally able to consent. University of Texas-Austin President Greg Fenves thought otherwise, and unilaterally suspended him for five semesters as a rapist. These are the allegations in a troubling federal lawsuit by student “John Doe” against Fenves personally for ignoring explicit UT-Austin policy on consent and devising his own standard – perhaps at the behest of a major donor.
Campus courts don’t necessarily give weight to evidence that favors students accused of rape. Fortunately for those students, real courts aren’t so flagrantly biased. A California Superior Court judge in Los Angeles tossed the state’s case against USC student Mr. Premjee, citing surveillance video from throughout the evening he spent with his female accuser.
University of Cincinnati is desperate to claim the nation’s most unfair campus sexual assault process. In this case, two students met on the Tinder app. The female later claimed the sex wasn’t consensual; the male said it was. At the hearing, neither the accuser nor the Title IX investigator, bothered to appear, denying indirect cross-examination. Panel Chair:’ OK, so the complainant is not here…Respondent, do you have any questions of the Title IX report?’ Accused Student: ‘Well, since she’s not here, I can’t really ask anything of the report.’ The student was found guilty and then sued. UC maintained that its denial of any cross-examination didn’t violate the student’s due process rights.The accused’s attorney Josh Engel faced no skeptical questions from the sixth circuit appeal panel, and made important points about why due process matters.
6th Circuit Summary w Audio Excerpts By KC Johnson